Our School » Continuous Improvement Plan (CIP)

Continuous Improvement Plan (CIP)

Grafton Elementary School 2023-25: Continuous Improvement Plan

Safe and Healthy Schools

Problem of Practice

54% of families responded negatively in regard to their student being academically well-prepared for the following year as measured by the Panorama survey.

19% of students responded favorably to the question about students respecting one another at school as measured by the Panorama survey.

Theory of Action

If students are expected to write a Learning Letter every Friday to their families about their learning, families will better understand how GES is preparing their student.

If students spend time acknowledging kind acts at school and if the adults celebrate those acts, there will be more kindness amongst students and lead students to feel more respected by their peers at school.

Prioritized SU Goal

Students will share their learning with the families, and families will sign and return the learning letter as a way of demonstrating their acknowledgment.

Students will share their kindness, and overall student respect for one another will improve.

Prioritized Strategies/Change Ideas

Develop a consistent Learning Letter template that includes weekly learning, strategies, and differentiation by grade level.

Develop a system for acknowledging kind acts and holding a ceremony on a monthly basis highlighting kindness.

Measures

Panorama Survey, Mid-Year Survey for families, SWISS data

Human, Materials, etc.

Learning Letter, Survey, ALL students, all staff, parents and families, Survey, punch cards to track kindness acts.

Academic Achievement

Problem of Practice

Students' ability to write for sustained periods of time is limited. When writing, students are not showing evidence of strong writing skills.

Theory of Action

If all students persevere through writing, which will be taught and assessed by all teachers through explicit tracking and progress monitoring, students' writing ability will improve as measured both by the length of writing and the quality of their writing.

Prioritized SU Goal

By June 2025, 100% of students will show growth as evidenced in their daily journal writing and trimester assessments in their Writing and their ability to sustain the task.

Prioritized Strategies/Change Ideas

Implement grammar and usage instruction, prewriting, writing, revising instruction, goal setting, and feedback to students.

Measures

Grammar and usage instruction, prewriting, writing, revising instruction, goal setting, and feedback to students.

Human, Materials, etc.

ILT teams, K-6 teachers, interventionists, specialists, counselors, nurse, ALL staff, coaches.

Equity Goal

Problem of Practice

Gaps across grade levels in ELA and Math proficiency persist between our marginalized students and their peers. Based on VT-CAP results from Spring 2023, 26% of the students who were identified as economically disadvantaged demonstrated proficiency in ELA and 13% demonstrated proficiency in math. In contrast, 34% of students not identified as economically disadvantaged demonstrated proficiency in ELA and 32% demonstrated proficiency in math.

Theory of Action

If we continue to implement a K-6 curriculum with IM, attend professional development sessions, and provide consistent coaching for all mathematics teachers, then student achievement and individual growth will increase. Additionally, if we systematically record, track, and analyze our math data via end-of-unit assessments and USNS as well as differentiated instruction and interventions based on this data, then student achievement and student growth will improve.

Prioritized SU Goal

By June 2025, 54% of students in grades 3-11 will demonstrate proficiency (above the 40th percentile) in math based on MAP achievement scores, and 60% will meet or exceed the average growth from Spring 2024-2025.

Prioritized Strategies/Change Ideas

Attend professional development focusing on the IM program, provide consistent coaching in math, record, track, and analyze math data via end-of-unit assessments, and differentiate instruction and intervention based on data.

Measures

MAP, USNS, end-of-unit assessments in Illustrative Math

Human, Materials, etc.

Data Teams, Intervention Teachers, Classroom Teachers, Math Coach, Principal.